Graicunas Theory Of Bridge Of Command - Example As Well As Formula

Graicunas Theory Of Bridge Of Command - Example As Well As Formula

Graicunas Theory Of Bridge Of Command - Example As Well As Formula

 was a Lithuanian french management consultant Graicunas Theory of Span of Control - Example in addition to Formula Graicunas Theory of Span of Control


Vytautas Andrius Graiciunas (1898-1952) was a Lithuanian french management consultant, management theorist in addition to engineer.

 was a Lithuanian french management consultant Graicunas Theory of Span of Control - Example in addition to Formula

Image Credits © Verslo Naujienos.

In 1933, he published a newspaper called "Relationship inward Organisation." In this paper, he mentioned 3 types of Superior-Subordinate relationships, viz.,

  1. Direct Single Relationships,
  2. Direct Group Relationships, and
  3. Cross Relationships.

According to V.A. Graicunas, every bit the issue of subordinates increases arithmetically (like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc.) the issue of relationships which the superior has to command too increases close geometrically (like 1, 6, 18, 44, 100, 244, etc.). Therefore, a superior tin entirely command a express issue of subordinates, in addition to anything beyond this restrain is real difficult to control.


 was a Lithuanian french management consultant Graicunas Theory of Span of Control - Example in addition to Formula Example of Graicunas Theory


V.A. Graicunas Theory tin hold out explained alongside the assistance of this unproblematic example.

For example, reckon Gaurav (G) is a superior (boss) in addition to Manoj (M) in addition to Sameer (S) are his subordinates (juniors or lower-grade employees).

 was a Lithuanian french management consultant Graicunas Theory of Span of Control - Example in addition to Formula

According to V.A. Graicunas, Gaurav (G) has to command next 3 types of relationships, alongside or amidst Manoj (M) in addition to Sameer (S):-

(a) Direct Single Relationships :-

G alongside M, in addition to G alongside S, i.e. a full of ii straight unmarried relationships.

(b) Direct Group Relationship :-

G alongside chiliad inward presence of S, in addition to G alongside due south inward presence of M, i.e. a full of ii straight grouping relationships.

(c) Cross Relationships :-

M alongside S, in addition to due south alongside M, i.e. ane time again a full of ii cross relationships.

Therefore, full issue of relationships which Gaurav (G) has to command are:- ii + ii + ii = half-dozen relationships.

Thus, when the issue of subordinates is 2, the issue of relationships, which the superior (boss) has to command is 6. Similarly, when the issue of subordinates is 3, the issue of relationships to command volition hold out 18.


 was a Lithuanian french management consultant Graicunas Theory of Span of Control - Example in addition to Formula Graicunas Formula


V.A. Graicunas has explained his principle alongside the assistance of the this formula:-

 was a Lithuanian french management consultant Graicunas Theory of Span of Control - Example in addition to Formula

By using Graicunas formula, nosotros tin notice out the issue of relationships (r), if the issue of subordinates (n) is given.

• Example of Graicunas Formula ↓

Consider this e.g. If a superior has v subordinates (n=5) hence the issue of relationships (r) which he has to command tin hold out calculated every bit follows:-

 was a Lithuanian french management consultant Graicunas Theory of Span of Control - Example in addition to Formula

 was a Lithuanian french management consultant Graicunas Theory of Span of Control - Example in addition to Formula

The inward a higher house tabular array or nautical chart was prepared past times using Graicunas formula.

According to V.A. Graicunas, when the issue of subordinates increases hence at that topographic point is an increment inward the Direct Single Relationships, Direct Group Relationships in addition to Cross Relationships.

So, every bit the issue of subordinates increases arithmetically, the issue of relationships amidst them too increases close geometrically.

So, according to him, a top-level managing director tin effectively create produce entirely 222 relationships. Therefore, a top-level managing director should non accept to a greater extent than than half-dozen subordinates. Similarly, a lower-level managing director should non accept to a greater extent than than xx subordinates.


 was a Lithuanian french management consultant Graicunas Theory of Span of Control - Example in addition to Formula Limitations of Graicunas Theory


The Graicunas Theory is criticised because of the next reasons:-

  1. He gives to a greater extent than importance to the numerical factor.
  2. He gives to a greater extent than importance to the relationships.

Blogger
Disqus
Pilih Sistem Komentar

No comments

Advertiser